No, that's wrong. The term "open source" as commonly used has a formal definition (http://opensource.org/osd-annotated) and this violates the very first term.
That is "source visible", I guess. But please don't confuse terminology: it's neither "open source" nor "free software".
That is "source visible", I guess. But please don't confuse terminology: it's neither "open source" nor "free software".