There are entire literal libraries filled to the brim with evidence of evolution. If you were really interested in reading it you would have noticed that you are practically swimming in evidence of it by now.
See, your unidiomatic usage of the word makes me worry that you don't even have a solid grasp on what evidence even is. I've already told you where you can read scientific literature about evolution, if you have any specific concerns I'm happy to discuss them; I often learn from those sort of conversations.
This isn't going to work if you refuse to read comments that other people are kind enough to give you. I am telling you that there is a staggering amount of evidence for evolution. If you think otherwise, then take your pick. Pick at that massive body of evidence wherever you want, you don't need me to tell you were to focus.
Lets roll with this bacteria idea though, you seem to think you've got a clever game-plan lined up; what is your problem with bacteria?
Sorry, I'm not trying to be smarter than you. Probably, I'm not. I'm just trying to make you see that actually, there is no evidence for evolution. What you have is tons of text books telling they showed you the evidence, but they did not. And I pic bacteria because everybody give this as an evidence and think it's a prove of evolution. And it is not because in the end of millions of interactions in the lab the final result that a bacteria is still a bacteria. Show an experiment that in the starts with a kind of animal and ends with another kind of animal. I could not find one.
The site has extensive information about evolution, as well as a section that addresses claims and assertions made by creationists/ID proponents about evolution. Even if you don't wind up accepting that evolution is the best currently available explanation for the diversity of life on earth, it'd be worth your while to have a look, if only to gain a better (and more accurate) understanding of the theory of evolution.
