Has he laid out in such stark terms, though? He has been saying the documents could cause "grievous damage" or something along those lines, but that's a far cry from "more damage to the US government in a minute alone than anyone else has ever had in the history of the United States."

Yeah he did get a bit less subtle about it in that interview. Anyone's guess as to whether that was a calculated change or just speaking off-the-cuff.

Discussing Greenwald is like playing Calvinball.

I don't know what you're talking about. Maybe it's you.