I do not argue that it should be covered. Just that it is irresponsible. I would argue that GMail accounts are as well.
"Picture this, man convicted of murder after subpoena to online marketing date reveals targeted ads for icotoners and shovels after GMail exchange with lawyer."
It's a stretch of the imagination but we live in a crazy world.
Which communication channels are supposed to be under attorney client privileges, then? I didn't know there was a list.