The notion of democratic itself is a flawed one - meaningful representation left the building a long time ago.
It is often used to evoke some sense of greater social justice.
Notice though, how notions such as 'willingness to invade other sovereign nations' or 'laws on books against fundamental human rights' or 'presence of any constitution or meaningful court of higher appeal' or 'centralization of media ownership' or 'measured trajectory of higher educational capacity' or 'number of excuses government can use to spy on or detain citizens' also seem conveniently out of scope.
Simply put, the notion we are sold of western democracy as some all-solving wonderland of equality and transparent empathetic good-governance is a farce. The more people lend rankings like these ones credence, the harder that is for people to see. (Though they certainly do have some utility, it is important also to see them critically.)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Democracy_Index_2012_gree...
[2] http://www.democracyranking.org/en/ranking.htm
If we're talking about economic freedom or the freedom of press, it's even worse:
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_Freedom_Index