Coinbase has been a serious slug in the bitcoin space.
"Most days we’ve been reaching our maximum amount of buys within an hour or two. Some fixes for that are in the works."
Yeah, customers have noticed and moved elsewhere. The giddy "oh we're growing so fast we can't keep up" worked for the first month. Now it just seems incompetent. Top that off with all the complaints about execution-time pricing, where execution time is some undetermined time up to a few days out, transactions being endlessly stuck in the system, and delays in moving bitcoins and funds, and you've got a dog of a Bitcoin player.
Sorry, these guys need to get it together fast and stop with the juvenile dismissive language for their very serious technical underperformance.
Exactly. Coinbase seems more and more like a starter science kit -- I used them to buy my first 10 bitcoins because it was easy, then realizing how hard it was to buy more at certain times, and not being able to keep money in your Coinbase account (all transactions get drawn from your bank account and take X days to clear before you can actually do anything with your BTC and when you sell BTC they get deposited into your bank account) took its toll. I now deal solely with the exchanges (MtGox, CampBX, BTC-E) - it's so much easier, and I think people also fail to realize there's a markup with using coinbase too.
Actually there are additional costs to using Mt Gox and other exchanges as well.
Aside from monetary ones, I know from experience that Mt Gox has horrible customer service. The size of their operation does not match the level of customer service required. Granted, banks suffer the same but at least they have B&M presence.
Sorry to hear that - agreed, it seems like the best support for all these exchanges is to not need it, because good luck getting a response. I've even seen situations with BitInstant where e-mailing them is pointless, but starting a reddit thread in r/bitcoin is the best way to get a response. This needs to change if Bitcoin is going to be the currency o the future.
It's not uncommon for services that are growing fast to be overloaded. Twitter is a famous recent example. Empirically it seems to be a predictor of success. Off the top of my head, I can only think of one startup (Friendster) that died because it couldn't handle its own popularity, and that was a pretty extreme case.
Friendster was the extreme case because, of the poor management behind the company. For instance, they went through 4 CEO's over a short period of time and they chose to do a full rewrite from Java to PHP instead of trying to scale the service and because, the rewrite wasn't implemented properly it had to be rewrote again a couple of years later. Moreover instead of sharding/portioning, Friendster chose to scale their service by purchasing an SAN and using daisy-chained MySQL which resulted in considerable slave lag. For comparison, Facebook on the other hand used colleges to "portion" their database in the early stages of the company.
Instead of doing the rewrite, Friendster should have focused on trying to scale the service like Twitter did by bringing in PivotalLabs - if Friendster sharded their database for instance it would have helped them immensely and may have resulted in a different outcome for the company.
The way Coinbase is behaving is actually costing people money though, and if you look at the Bitcoin forums users have been pissed for months. They haven't just been having capacity issues letting people buy Bitcoins either; even once users have got Bitcoins into their account there's been problems with them delaying payments out, to the point other services have been telling people not to pay from Coinbase: http://blog.bitpay.com/2013/03/applying-late-transactions-to...
The combination of this being a financial institution, there being more robust competition, and the absence of lock-in might make this an exeption. I hate to be critical like this, but there have been months of user complaints and nothing but upbeat rhetoric in response.
Granted if Coinbase builds a solid product, this will all be dust on the road. The competition is not "good enough" yet.
It's not just a technical problem. You've got a couple guys in an incubator, moving in with a few thousand dollars funding to start a website, who suddenly have to figure out how to safely float X million dollars in currency exchange on a rapidly fluctuating market with a huge ask/bid gap. If they overextend themselves too far on the BTC pool they hold in front of a spike/crash, they have no capital to correct, they could go under overnight.
I decided to finally buy a bitcoin for fun. I entered my personal information, verified my bank account, tried to buy one bitcoin after waiting a week for capacity reasons -- then I get an email saying that they can't fulfill my purchase for some generic "security" reason. This was after another 5 day wait.
Real poor experience, can't say I feel the urge to try again with them anytime soon.
I read you have to have your Dwolla linked to your bank account for over a month to use CampBX. I just set up my Dwolla to bank over the weekend and verified. I want to buy a bitcoin or two for fun. Any ideas?
Not true - I had my Dwolla account for less than that before I transferred a bunch of money to CampBX - note that unverified accounts on CBX have a maximum daily transfer limit of $1k
Also, if you're interested in grabbing a bitcoin or two, I'll do it for a fellow HN'er for no markup. E-mail me at hi.im.edward [at] gmail for more info.
Edit: Just realized there's no PM feature on the site - email me :)
I've only ever used BitInstant, granted, it was back a few months ago when you could buy several for under $100, but the convenience of paying in cash at WalMart was pretty cool.
My MTGox account ended up being funded quickly as well. I'd definitely recommend them.
Is that so? I signed up for an account a few months ago, and from what I could tell I was unable to do anything other than link my Dwolla account and read the instructions on how to submit photo ID to get approved.
edit: I just checked. It's still the case. I cannot transfer money (USD) from Dwolla to MtGox without sending MtGox my photo id.
"Most days we’ve been reaching our maximum amount of buys within an hour or two. Some fixes for that are in the works."
Yeah, customers have noticed and moved elsewhere. The giddy "oh we're growing so fast we can't keep up" worked for the first month. Now it just seems incompetent. Top that off with all the complaints about execution-time pricing, where execution time is some undetermined time up to a few days out, transactions being endlessly stuck in the system, and delays in moving bitcoins and funds, and you've got a dog of a Bitcoin player.
Sorry, these guys need to get it together fast and stop with the juvenile dismissive language for their very serious technical underperformance.