Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

it's Ockham's razor time:

Cookie-stuffing results in a significant cost to eBay and no additional revenue. No sane company would sanction it (beyond maybe turning a blind eye to someone doing the odd bit of cookie-stuffing if they earned most of their commission on driving real sales). Of course, plenty of sane companies that have departments that don't talk to each other about ongoing investigations and sales guys focused on next month's commission...

The program managers' role was to encourage an apparently very effective affiliate marketer to drive more real traffic to eBay, whether that was because they believed most of his referrals were genuine, thought they could persuade him to switch strategy to actually doing real marketing for eBay or simply adopting a business-as-usual approach whilst waiting for the fraud investigation to conclude. Either way, by his own admission Hogan wasn't remotely interested in investing in actually driving traffic to eBay even if they provided additional cash to support it...



I agree. The interests of an individual may not always 100% align with the overall interests of the company. That's true at eBay as it's true at almost every company out there.

I am more interested, for example, at making the clients I talk to on a day to day basis happy with my work than I am on the exact profit margin my company makes every time I bill an hour of my time to that account. I see my job as making my clients happy, not making my company's stockholders richer. Hopefully one leads to the other.


Agree. The reality is that the people managing the affiliate programs aren't that knowledgeable. Any encouragement was just blind rah rah boostering, with no comprehension of how they were driving commissions.

If anything, this just shows how clueless big companies are about online marketing "techniques".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: