Not sure I'm following you... the article talks about how the US can switch to wind and solar energy (as well as biofuel for the lulls on non-windy, cloudy days) and meet 100% of our energy demands that way. So yes, the author is advocating solving our problems with sun and wind instead of coal, natural gas, and radioactive material.
If done right, this will be rather transparent to you, the end user[1], it will reduce our dependence on non-renewable fuels, and create jobs in the process. You will still be able to plug in your TV to the wall and have it work.
