Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

What is wrong with breaking the build when the underlying assumptions change? I consider this a good thing. My initial assertion that many warnings are latent errors (bugs) implies that the most inconvenient time is when the product is in the hands of users.

I have another guideline that I frequently apply: Don't update your tools if you're close to cutting a new release. This mitigates the risk of unexpected build issues a the worst possible time.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: