Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

c1.xlarges are thought to be effectively the only VM on a machine. I can't dig up the article that proposed the methodology for determining offhand.

c1.xlarges still underperform far under what I'd expect.




Are VMs ever really performant?


Compared to the 26 ECU m3.2xl, the 20 ECU c1.xl underperforms it by 3x (basic web, JSON struct) in my tests.


Modern hypervisors have an overhead as low as 2%, so yes, they absolutely are. It is often worth virtualizing simply for the flexibility/management that it bring, even if it's a single virtual machine on a very large box.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: