that 90% of the current acts in dance music scenes would never be capable of clearing an album because of the overhead in licensing.
This appears to have two interpretations, one that the cost of licensing would be prohibitive. This seems reasonable - if there is a desire to remix then I see no reason why society should not say we will allow this at a reasonable cost. It encourages reuse and original creativity. It's a licensing issue.
The other, that it is too difficult to remember which tracks you sampled, seems invalid and is down to the professional musician upping their tools.
Overall, I have missed the last 250 years of musical progress, but I still think copyright is a good way of rewarding creativity.
This appears to have two interpretations, one that the cost of licensing would be prohibitive. This seems reasonable - if there is a desire to remix then I see no reason why society should not say we will allow this at a reasonable cost. It encourages reuse and original creativity. It's a licensing issue.
The other, that it is too difficult to remember which tracks you sampled, seems invalid and is down to the professional musician upping their tools.
Overall, I have missed the last 250 years of musical progress, but I still think copyright is a good way of rewarding creativity.