Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Judge Walter also seemed unimpressed by Zediva's argument against an injunction. "Defendants claim, without any evidence, that an injunction would significantly harm, if not destroy, their business," he wrote. He ruled that the harm to movie studios from lost revenues outweighed any hardship Zediva faced.

That is ridiculous. "You are right, it would destroy your business, but it might hurt their bottom line a little bit".




You are right, it would destroy your business

Uhm, in your quote, he clearly says the claim of business destruction is "without any evidence".


How much evidence do you need? Our entire and sole business is this thing you are about to injunct. Do they have to prove they don't also grow magical money trees?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: