Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Just to clarify, I was i no way criticizing your choice to not use mozart-oz. I took the opportunity to give a reference to the mozart-oz as a language used outside the context of book.



I didn't take it as such, and I hope it didn't come across like I was getting irritated/defensive.

While I have your attention, do you have any other interesting links/references for it? Outside of CTM and its companion wiki, I've seen it mentioned on the c2 wiki (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?OzLanguage http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MozartProgrammingSystem http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MultiParadigmProgrammingLanguage , etc.), but I haven't run across it otherwise. That might just be the places & niches I frequent, though.

It looks like there's a FreeBSD port of Mozart, FWIW (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=mozart&stype=...), though !i386 is flagged as broken.


well, my old link collection for oz is a little out of date but there should be some academic mention in the http://www.cpaior.org/ conferences series. (I used mozart-oz to create some hybrid algorithms back in the days but I didn't do it in the academic field but used it in commercial applications that I no longer are involved in)

Christian Schulte,http://web.it.kth.se/~cschulte/papers.html, wrote a book or collection of papers "Programming Constraint Services" that really what I can recall was using mozart-oz.

As you can see I only reference mozart-oz in the context of CP-AI-OR but 2000-2004 I used it more or less weekly to do all kind of "normal" programming (whatever that is;)).

This will give some more odd results http://www.google.se/search?q=round+robin+scheduling+mozart


Thanks!




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: