Its funny, in my Oral History exams I got a Text and had 10 min to analyze it.
The Text could easly reprinted today, maybe switch out the word 'machine' with 'robot' once in a while.
This idea has been around since more then 100 years and it has shown again an again to not be true. I have nothing against bringing up the same stuff again but if you do that you have to improve your argument not just reprint popular essays from 100 years ago with modern language.
Tell me exactly what fundamental thing has changed with todays innovations that was not true for innovations in 1920 for example.
The Text could easly reprinted today, maybe switch out the word 'machine' with 'robot' once in a while.
This idea has been around since more then 100 years and it has shown again an again to not be true. I have nothing against bringing up the same stuff again but if you do that you have to improve your argument not just reprint popular essays from 100 years ago with modern language.
Tell me exactly what fundamental thing has changed with todays innovations that was not true for innovations in 1920 for example.