I'm wondering what it will look like in 2D because not only was it shot at 48fps, but it was presumably also shot with a shutter speed of 1/96th of a second. 24fps films are shot with a 1/48th second shutter speed, so the motion blur helps to compensate for the lack of temporal accuracy. Showing a film shot at 48fps, 1/96th shutter at 24fps by presumably throwing away every other frame would result in much more "choppy" and stark motion than a film that was shot for 24fps to begin with. I'm wondering if they used some kind of process to generate fake motion blur for the 24fps version, sort of the opposite of what our 240hz TVs do?