Yes, I think you've gotten through to me. You're willing to hold strong opinions regarding the core discipline of the Western Tradition in a state of abject ignorance, on the grounds that actually educating yourself on the topic before forming such an opinion is analogous to committing suicide in order to understand suicide.
That's as bizarre a rationale for willful illiteracy as I can think of. You seem content with it, and I wish you well.
Do you have an opinion on the utility of suicide? But how can you, without having personally committing suicide? Am I getting thorough to you?
> You have a cartoon version of philosophy in your mind that is in sore need of remediation.
You mean the thesis that philosophers argue for centuries without ever resolving anything? That's hardly controversial.
> These are precisely the kinds of questions that philosophers have been utterly preoccupied with for centuries.
Q.E.D.