Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Developers do hate paying for things, but that doesn't mean you cant make a business selling to them. You just need to make a much more compelling offering than they could reasonably create themselves.

For example, my company (https://circleci.com) makes Continuous-integration-as-a-service, marketed directly to developers. We have a lot of companies using us with incredible engineers (Stripe and Zencoder are 2 obvious examples who have agreed to be listed on our homepage, we have many more). Why - when they can build it themselves? Because we have built a compelling product that is much better than they could do themselves (and in many cases they tried)!

To give you one example, one customer has a test suite that takes 60 minutes on his laptop. He just pushes to Circle when he wants to test, and he gets a result in 13 minutes (blazing fast build servers, plus automatic parallelization)! That would overload a single build server, so they'd have to get a cluster set up. That sounds like fun , but only for the first hour.




What is the pricing for CirclCI, I can't find any on your site, and that makes me less intersted in trying it out :-)

(and is there support for not github based hosting?)

[edit] And I see that you dont support ghc (haskell). Oh well, I guess I still need to wait for Travis CI to roll out there paid version :)


Pricing is $19/$49/$149 for 1/10/40 private repos. That includes unlimited builds, unlimited test time, etc.

We don't support non-GitHub sorry.

We do support ghc, and have a few customers using it. I should write a doc for that.


why isn't the pricing listed on the site? That seems a bit odd! :-)


It is silly, yes. You see it when you log in. We're in the process of reworking the front page, and part of that will be getting the pricing onto it.


Please do. Whenever I don't see transparent pricing, I assume it's prohibitively expensive.

Also, frictionless CI as a service? You are doing God's work. I hope you succeed.


cool, what versions of ghc? (or is it haskell platform only?) (I am doing some 7.6.* heavy work, and thats ignoring occasionally playing with just patching GHC itself! :) )


Haskell platform at the moment, but we can add things relatively easily, especially if they have debs available (in ubuntu 12.04 or elsewhere).


Interesting.

1) does that give a path towards users providing their own *.deb bundles and thus being able to use their own choice in compiler versions?

2) part 1 is a bit important, I may be doing a lot of dev work against ghc head (or patched versions thereof) in the coming months (though not for another 2-4 months realistically), and unless i can a la carte plug in the ghc version I want, i may a well roll my own thing on top of jenkins and the like :)


I tried it out and the CircleCI team installed the latest Haskell platform, so I was up and running with cabal tests in five minutes.


"CircleCI" makes more sense than "CircleCi", though both can be found on your website. Congratulations on such a compelling service.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: