This. If you want someone with honest insight into high energy theory, you probably shouldn't listen to a person who still pushes out papers that favour MOND over DM by curve-fitting special galaxies. This topic has been studied to death and it simply doesn't work well enough to warrant such strong opinions against DM. That's why her papers mostly go ignored in the community (many of them aren't even physics anymore and edge more into philosophy-babble or even sociology). All they do is make captivating conspiracy youtube videos for the average layperson.
You seem to have mistaken this fact for an opinion (all too common for her followers unfortunately). Fortunately, you can easily look up everything I said. But sorry, I don't have time to make brainrot youtube videos for people with no relevant education and no attention span. If you didn't know these things before, you also won't learn them on youtube. And I actually still have real work to do.
Of course, this sole HN comment is worth ten times more than a famous person making scientific videos on the internet... BTW, I wonder where is her mondo-meter at (aka "stuff" vs "model fixing").
We all know she has many enemies in the academics since targetting its funding... you are more likely to be one of them than anything else.
One comment. No. Countless scientific papers that have boiled into an accepted picture? Absolutely. But you won't hear about them if you only listen to one source on youtube who makes videos for non-scientists. Instead you'll see conspiracy everywhere. Like here somehow.
