Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Who said? You are posting a link that also makes an unverified claim. I personally never heard this claim about mRNA vaccines.




I posted a terrible source, my fault, moving too quickly. Here are three published human sources. Now you have heard the claim and seen some evidence.

mRNA vaccination stimulates robust GCs containing vaccine mRNA and spike antigen up to 8 weeks postvaccination in some cases. https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(22)00076-9?rss...

The vaccine mRNA was detectable and quantifiable up to 14–15 days postvaccination in 37% of subjects. The decay kinetics of the intact mRNA and ionizable lipid were identical, suggesting the intact lipid nanoparticle recirculates in blood. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.4c11652

A significant number of those who died within 30 days post-vaccination had detectable vaccine in their lymph nodes. All patients with detectable vaccine in their heart also had healing myocardial injury, which started before or at the time of their last vaccine dose. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00742-7


The first study also shows there was basically no detectable vaccine mRNA outside of lymphatic germinal centers, which contradicts your following claims. Almost as if you can't cherry-pick study statements to make some argument.

The “following” are not my claims but quotes from the studies, which are independent of each other and free to make their own claims. My claim (if I made one) is that we were misled about how much we know whether the jab stays at the injection site and degrades quickly. I have not contradicted myself.



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: