Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Prior to confronting Daisey, they presented his work as if they had fact checked it. They say as much in their retraction:

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/460/r...

My opinion is that they handled it well, but 'simply the ones who confronted Daisey directly and publicly' throws away quite a bit of the story.




That's true, but they were not the only ones who fell prey to that either. My point about why TAL stands out is that they were the ones to confront him on it. Not that they were unique in having asserted that his story was true.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: