Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Precisely, I'm not sure why Curtis is kept being discussed when if you listened to him now, it's all nonsense.


Because he says rich people should rule the world, ergo rich people like him and attempt to encode his very stupid ideas into our politics, ergo we all have to care what he says

It’s really a testament to how astonishingly stupid some of those rich folks are that they find any of Yarvin’s work compelling.


And, to put this in perspective, there's 1 degree of separation between our current Vice president and Yarvin. I can guarantee that the two of them have had conversations about politics as Vance is quite close to Thiel who loves Yarvin.

These rich people have very powerful connections.


That's what I've been wondering. How is this much different from Nixon's trickle down economics? An idea the wealthy are happy to promote because it protects their influence.


More to the point, how is this any different than serfdom? The inevitable result of "optimize for the wealthy" seems to be that. And, well, we did that. And it sucked.

I don't understand why we're reinventing feudalism over and over again and acting like it's novel. Giving all the tools to the wealthy doesn't make society a better place, and we've proved that. It decidedly stagnates everything, which, ironically, leads to very poor living conditions, including for the wealthy. So it's not even good for them, it's just self-destructive.


We wouldn't but the broligarchs are influenced by his ideas, and those have common cause with Project 2025 and the current US administration.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: