And if you truly have the right people you don't need to to worry about agile, you are already doing so well that agile will only slow you down. Agile is probably ideal for larger organisations who unfortunately don't have the "right" people and need a framework or something to help them along. Once people get competent enough, "agile" just starts to feel dogmatic and restrictive. I mean they will still do the practices that make sense, but they aren't going to appreciate other aspects of buying into a whole "agile" approach.
When you say "[Aa]gile" here are you talking about a particular process (Scrum? XP?) or something else? I can't really understand the intent - especially since in my experience agile works better with smaller organisations than large ones.
When you say "[Aa]gile" here are you talking about a particular process (Scrum? XP?) or something else? I can't really understand the intent - especially since in my experience agile works better with smaller organisations than large ones.