Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Ironically, a successful populist movement becomes the new elite and creates an opportunity for other people to be populists.

Generally the first part is the defining feature of a populist movement: a leader or faction that seeks to insist that the only solution to elites or other hated minorities or purported threats is to assume that anyone trying to stop them accumulating more power is an agent of the elites. Naturally this rhetorical style suits people that want to accumulate a lot of power and wealth and don't want to give too many straight answers to questions about what they're doing with it.

That's why Maduro, an oligarch who's been in power for over 12 years and decides exactly who is and isn't "elite" in his country is characterised as "populist" because his rhetorical style is all about claiming that he's on the side of the poor against [what's left of] the middle classes, whilst a civil war or coup which usually leads to elites being deposed may not involve populists at all.



> That's why Maduro, an oligarch who's been in power for over 12 years and decides exactly who is and isn't "elite" in his country is characterised as "populist"

Who is characterizing him as populist? His supporters in India or the global elite? (Honest question, I don't know much about India.)


I think you're confusing Maduro with Modi...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: