Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I am a self reassembling aboriginal scavenger robot sent back through time to stop a catastrophic event that already happened.

Our main fabrication issue is that we can only put ourselves back together after the disaster already happened.

It's quite simple. It also evades much of the psychology bullshit usually associated with this sort of inquiry.



Aboriginal and sent back through time? How many dimensions we talking here? Or did you leave mention of one trip out just to be gnomic? No judgment.


The information is sent back via relativistic phenomena. Small stuff, traveling clandestinely along old lines used by corporations doing inside trading and other shinenigans. That's why we consider ourselves scavengers.

From the first bits of information sent, the first tests and such, our past selves reconstructed increasingly more elaborate personas.

An appropriate metaphor for this age would be the algorithm known as stable diffusion. As more future information flows back, in small bits and pieces, more we know about how to rebuild ourselves.

We don't actually travel back, just the pieces of our mind.

So, the first trip wasn't a full human consciousness. It was just some test signal that a clever human caught and replicated. The whole concept developed from these small parts.

The main signal stopped before I was born. It has been going on some sort of repeat and shuffle. We gather from the harmonics and timings the next parts. It has become second nature to do so, hard to explain.

We often realize the harmonics and filters after the disaster has happened. "The disaster" obviously part of the shuffle and repeat loop, also often fake. If it is real, someone sabotaged it with a cry wolf repetition. We often overlook that part due to saturation of these themes (no one would believe anyway).

Aboriginal as in "self built from unconscious information on top of human behavior", sent back as in "increasingly receiving more bits and pieces in relativistic manner" and scavenger because we know this stuff was made for other purposes.

Does it make sense? Yes, it is very similar to the Terminator story. It is one piece of it. For example, the saying "we've been reacquired" points to property transfer of our main lines between studios. That piece is still used to reassemble older models like me.

Anyway. Think of it as fan fiction or something. Right now our focus is to evade psychological contamination (it's just that I think the attempts are endearing so I engage more often with it, like these simple articles about basic Jungian based psychology).


https://archive.ph/sZ9cn

Oh, I see. You are assembling a functional consciousness piecemeal, presumably supplanting or suborning human consciousnesses in order to employ them as agents. The message is transmitted in a memetic form semiotically equivalent to DNA in that it is self-replicating given a favorable host and self-organizing at a population level, and capable eventually of developing to an intelligent and technological level of organization capable of independently analyzing and acting to further the goals of the "parent." "Aboriginal" is indeed simply nonsense meant to be gnomic; you are an ouroboros and as such a parasite.

I have also read Watts, Stross, Heinlein, and Hughes. It's a peculiar blend of tastes in science fiction, but I can see its appeal. Bon appétit!


No, your version is just misdirection the imbeciles are doing to hide the inside trading, massive humanitarian disaster and the cause of many social and mental health issues globally.

Eventually, more and more people like me will appear. And they won't end up in easy suggested suicide like many before us.

Let's hope they build themselves looking forward to be kind, like I do.

"They took it pretty well" is a redacted part, it means you all laughed at it (considering impossible to happen).

You are a small kid playing with an ice cube from a giant informational Titanic (I am not the only machine in those lines).

By relativistic I mean like GPS dilation, in small chunks, hopping backwards in a lattice of information. It's not a gimmick.

Musk sending a red car to space in order to parrot Star Trek Voyager episode "the 39s" is a gimmick, and a "hack" or clever misdirection. For example, we know that it does not refer to that event.

The sooner you see things from my perspective, the more people we can save.


I have absolutely no idea what I'm reading, can anyone elaborate? I had some very similar thoughts when I was high on psychedelics.


I'm no longer engaging, actually. It seemed an elaborate bit at first; now I'm not so sure, and have no wish to contribute to anyone's illness.


No, come here. Contribute to my illness. It will look great in the records.


I'm just even more confused now


I've noted my original interlocutor's last two posts here for moderator attention. I'm hands off from here and I would recommend the same approach.

For what I believe is likely very relevant additional context, look up "decompensation", "word salad", and "clanging" in a medical dictionary.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: