I strongly disagree with this article, I think that the DMA is great.
This article, to me, sounds like "oh no, the EU is making it harder for monopolies to keep their monopoly, it will surely hurt the users!". I strongly believe it is the opposite: the DMA is going against monopolies with the goal to allow more competition, and therefore better products for users.
If the EU doesn't get Apple features, great: that will leave space for competitors. And the EU really needs as many non-US competitors as possible, because the US have become hostile.
Why is it that people who are not even affected by this cry the loudest? I, an EU citizen, love that we are standing up to the big corporations like this. GO EU!
You gotta love when the first sentence of an article's body paragraph walks back the only salient concern users could have:
> Maybe Apple will never fully walk away from Europe
What do Apple customers even have to worry about? App developers making too much money? Apple Intelligence getting delayed until third-party, non-OpenAI options are given equal footing?
It's all so terribly sad watching affiliate sites try to demonize the effort. Apple has already lost, we're in the rectification phase now.
Apple most certainly abuses their dominant position (like any company if you allow them). The fact that nobody can use the NFC to build a payment app because Apple can keep it to themselves is abusive. The interoperability clause of the DMA aims at preventing that kind of abuse.
This article, to me, sounds like "oh no, the EU is making it harder for monopolies to keep their monopoly, it will surely hurt the users!". I strongly believe it is the opposite: the DMA is going against monopolies with the goal to allow more competition, and therefore better products for users.
If the EU doesn't get Apple features, great: that will leave space for competitors. And the EU really needs as many non-US competitors as possible, because the US have become hostile.