Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I understand your point about NATO's historical funding issues, but this isn't just about money - it's about aligning with shared democratic values and international accountability.

The 2% GDP threshold has indeed been a persistent issue, but European nations have substantially increased defense spending since 2022. The proposed alliance would be fundamentally different from NATO in two key ways:

1. It would prioritize democratic values and rule of law accountability (ICC membership) over simply being anti-Russia

2. It would develop true strategic autonomy through indigenous defense production

NATO remains structurally dominated by US interests and equipment with their potential "kill switches." Recent events demonstrate why European security can't be outsourced to powers with potentially divergent interests.

The existing industrial and technological capabilities across Europe are more than sufficient to create a credible deterrent force when properly coordinated. This isn't about creating something from scratch, but realigning existing resources toward greater sovereignty.

Democracy and rule of law aren't just ideals - they're strategic assets worth defending with our own means.



I appreciate the explanation. That sounds incredibly reasonable (from my naive perspective).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: