Ok, fair enough, I didn't mean to be rude. It's just that it sounds a lot like stuff that people who push fairly sexist stuff say.
The thread is about evolution, and sexual selection in the context of evolution generally implies having an evolutionary fitness. I missed the part about birth control, since then we're not really talking about whether sexual selection is having a role in human evolution.
In the context of sexual selection affecting evolutionary fitness, it seems clear that there is an inverse relationship between wealth and number of offspring.
I am not sure if there are any scientific studies purporting to link "reputation" and either marriage or offspring. Do you know of any?
>In the context of sexual selection affecting evolutionary fitness, it seems clear that there is an inverse relationship between wealth and number of offspring.
This inverse is caused be birth control and economic circumstance. For the poor person, more kids means more kids on the farm to work. So the poor person chooses to have more kids via not using birth control.
For rich people in rich areas, more kids equals more college tuition to pay. So the rich person chooses to have less kids via using birth control.
That's what causes it. I'm too lazy to cite sources but this comes from anthropology 101 it's textbook stuff. And like most anthro stuff the studies are qualitative, so take from it what you will.
>I am not sure if there are any scientific studies purporting to link "reputation" and either marriage or offspring. Do you know of any?
It's even in the wikipedia. It's also quite obvious if you've interacted with a lot of women before.
Look I know there's this woke movement that likes to cover up a lot of the dark stuff surrounding human behavior. Men and women have dark sides and this is just one of the darker things about women: Hypergamy. I think the thing that makes it more intriguing then the dark side of men is that culture and society basically masks this fact about women.
You see the double standard here? You can call men dumb and into boobs and butts and physical pleasures but to even mention something superficial about women you became all reactive about it like it's sexist. Men ARE into boobs and butts, that's just a fundamental truth and it's not sexist. Neither is this. It's also obvious.
The thread is about evolution, and sexual selection in the context of evolution generally implies having an evolutionary fitness. I missed the part about birth control, since then we're not really talking about whether sexual selection is having a role in human evolution.
In the context of sexual selection affecting evolutionary fitness, it seems clear that there is an inverse relationship between wealth and number of offspring.
I am not sure if there are any scientific studies purporting to link "reputation" and either marriage or offspring. Do you know of any?