Where are the hordes of other scientists trying to prove Darwinism false?
I hope they are reading the prior literature on the science of evolution, for example as assembled in the "29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent,"
so that they understand what "Darwinism" is today after 150 years of scientists checking facts and refining the understanding of the origin of species. Alas, there are still spectacular examples of people who purport to be scientists who disagree with Darwin
I hope they are reading the critiques, but as your comment proves, scientists trying to prove Darwinism false are just people purporting to be scientists.
I hope they are reading the prior literature on the science of evolution, for example as assembled in the "29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent,"
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
so that they understand what "Darwinism" is today after 150 years of scientists checking facts and refining the understanding of the origin of species. Alas, there are still spectacular examples of people who purport to be scientists who disagree with Darwin
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/07/21/creationist-fu...
who totally misunderstand what Darwin meant and what evidence has turned up in more recent generations to refine our understanding of evolution.