> Berners-Lee, the creator of the Web, chose the name “World Wide Web” because he wanted to emphasize that, in this global hypertext system, anything could link to anything else
Berners-Lee was brought up as a rejoinder to various decision makers who originally agreed to implement it, being that the www is more original than twitter, and fwiw he's not an American.
It's quite exasperating to find someone arguing that there is some benefit to regression towards applications which don't link into other applications. Why be on the web at all?
If someone limits your options to only two, or even one source of resources, are you better off?
This discussion thread emerged from the suggestion of "maybe that's a good thing." Is it?
It's a question of trust, competition, and whether there's so much destruction of honest competition that only the destructive and twisted competition remains, keeping people afraid to venture into the unknown, willing to perpetuate the cycle of destroying competitors and endangering civilization itself.
This comment is so deep in the comment chain that it makes no sense to talk generally about this when the thread starting comments are available for you to reply too…
Are we not talking about opinion vs opinion ? What twitter engineers think is good for twitter vs what web engineers think is good for the web ? I don't really follow what your assertion is, I would be happy to elaborate my position if you elaborate yours.
https://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2011/01/why-the-web...
The net is fundamentally about linking things together.