94% recovery, correcting for inflation since 2008, is a 64% recovery. And that's the best case that you put money in at the last possible moment. If your money went into the scheme in 1994 instead, that's a lot more inflation that you got to suffer.
Not to mention the downside of not having access to your money for this long.
I'm sure that a 94% recovery took a Herculean effort. But people who bought into the scheme, still had large and very real losses.
It’s a bit confusing because this is about the “victims” of Bernie Madoff (mainly feeder funds I guess?), which are separate from the direct creditors of Bernie Madoff and his company (which sits at ~15 distributions, and still ongoing, currently totaling $14.7b or ~71% of claims, but the first US$1.5m of any claim has been 100% satisfied).
It’s important to consider that if you more than broke even, you could be in serious trouble returning the money. Some people used and spent the money as income. And now they have to return it back from their own assets.
94% recovery, correcting for inflation since 2008, is a 64% recovery. And that's the best case that you put money in at the last possible moment. If your money went into the scheme in 1994 instead, that's a lot more inflation that you got to suffer.
Not to mention the downside of not having access to your money for this long.
I'm sure that a 94% recovery took a Herculean effort. But people who bought into the scheme, still had large and very real losses.