Not saying that's impossible. Certainly a ghost gun has an advantage to corrupt government agents just as it does to criminals.
But it's going to be difficult to make it stick against a patsy.
What will be very suspicious is if he dies in custody before trial. Otherwise, at trial, I expect:
* He has no alibi
* The ballistic evidence matches the gun.
* He has possession of additional ammunition from the same lot.
* He was in fact a client of UHC with a substantial claim denial history
* His computers/phone show that he was cyber-stalking
If they have all that, I don't think a reasonable person could believe that the FBI crime lab and Google can be coerced in a grand conspiracy into fabricating evidence.
If it turns out that the gun is a "2nd ghost gun", and the prosecution claims that he ditched the 1st gun and the ammo, and his alibi is "weak", and he cleared his digital history, that would be a much weaker more suspicious case.
But it's going to be difficult to make it stick against a patsy.
What will be very suspicious is if he dies in custody before trial. Otherwise, at trial, I expect:
* He has no alibi
* The ballistic evidence matches the gun.
* He has possession of additional ammunition from the same lot.
* He was in fact a client of UHC with a substantial claim denial history
* His computers/phone show that he was cyber-stalking
If they have all that, I don't think a reasonable person could believe that the FBI crime lab and Google can be coerced in a grand conspiracy into fabricating evidence.
If it turns out that the gun is a "2nd ghost gun", and the prosecution claims that he ditched the 1st gun and the ammo, and his alibi is "weak", and he cleared his digital history, that would be a much weaker more suspicious case.