Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I can't trust that number if it comes from Waymo.com. I'd need to see it from an independant third party who has no interest having their finger on the scale



The authors are from:

a Swiss Reinsurance Company, Ltd, Switzerland

b Zardini Lab (research affiliate), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA

c Autonomous Systems Laboratory (research affiliate), Stanford University, USA

d Waymo LLC, USA

e Casualty Actuarial Society, USA


Swiss Re is the actual thing when it comes to actuarial tables and statistics.


And would be very motivated to know the correct numbers in this case.


So not independent. And published as a white paper on Waymo's website. And only addresses the collaboration between Waymo and the insurance company, no mention of who funded the academics. Pretty sure if you dig deep enough, Swiss Re is somehow a Waymo investor.

I'd trust this more if Waymo had a direct pipeline to an anonymized public repository of their complete data set for independent analysis


So you can't really trust it due to the obvious conflict of interest.


I mean.. I get that for the Waymo guys. But the SwissRE ones? Seriously? Who _should_ do that evaluation? You will necessarily have Waymo co-authors. They have to provide the data. They are the only ones who have that..


Most of this data they publish to the Government for legal reasons. Sure they could lie to the Government, but ask Cruise how well that went.

Anecdotally, I see Waymos around town, and they are very clearly driving in a slower, safer, more cautious manner. a 92% reduction seems very plausible.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: