Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think the parent comment classifies the F150 as dangerous not to the driver but to everyone around it.



exactly, Pedestrian safety of all american trucks is terrible, yet we don't hear about the big speeding wall that are the 'conventional' american truck... but apparently the cyber truck is a pedestrian predator they 'suddenly' discovered.

Either do something about the terrible truck design... or shut up and tolerate the cyber truck like you tolerate the F150 EV or whatever.

Fluff like this just pollutes the EV news space without providing any new info.


Surely the fact that it's a three ton machine that can accelerate from 0-60 in 3 seconds is relevant too. As far as I'm aware the F150 can't match that.


> Surely the fact that it's a three ton machine that can accelerate from 0-60 in 3 seconds is relevant too. As far as I'm aware the F150 can't match that.

The F150 EV has similar weight and speed[1], not sure how it's relevant?

In fact it proves the point, no one talks about how the F150 EV or the Silverado EV etc etc having similar characteristic flaws as the cyber truck, because that doesn't generate clicks.

If anything should be generating articles, it should be the Hummer EV, that things in absurdly big, heavy and fast, even for american trucks... but that doesn't generate clicks.

Cybertruck gets undue attention, mostly negative because clickbait, and we should stop clicking such obvious baits.

[1]: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a40120063/2022-ford-f-150-...


People do, all the time, you just did too. You just linked to an article that did.


I'm talking about hyperbolic negative coverage, that provide no new information or insight, but bait to attract clicks.


Well, no, not exactly, you literally just wrote another reply, right below, explicitly saying no, you didn't mean weight, you meant people talking about the slicing edges of the cybertruck.

It's not the front shape or slicing people. It's the weight. I have no idea why you think anyone is hand-wringing about slicing people. No one thinks slicing people with hard edges is the problem.

It makes sense if you're A) mad about All Duh People Lying About Slicing Car or B) Actually All Heavy Cars Are Bad. You are stuck on saying A but wanting to make sense, as in B, which is at least internally coherent and reality-based, if purist.


    > It's not the front shape or slicing people. It's the weight. I have no idea why you think anyone is hand-wringing about slicing people. No one thinks slicing people with hard edges is the problem.
I literally provided links the reply below you mentioned, please read them! they do talk about the weight, but they are much more worried about the shape and its effect on pedestrian collision.

Please read the links, I'll share them here again.

https://www.wired.com/story/a-rubberized-cybertruck-is-ploug...

https://www.transportenvironment.org/uploads/files/2024-10-0...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: