Ukrainian army wanted geofence to be lifted, their attack wasn't sabotaged like the rumor mill framed it. Starlink was not, at that point, party to a contract with the state department that gave them permission to provide uplinks to IEDs. They do now, for what it's worth (via "starshield"). Imagine whatever company you work at getting a call asking for an extra license immediately because they need it to bomb North Korea, you might say, hold on while I get legal on the phone.

Funny how people on twitter claim 'treason' but somehow the DoD disagrees. Who should we trust with this one I wonder.

The story as popularly told was simply inaccurate. I suggest you do some more research.

I don’t remember the Ukraine being the same nation as the United States but maybe I missed some movement on Twitter.

A US funded military strike that didn't fund his receivers in full in a location where the US government didn't want it's weapons used and is still illegal today to provide services to?

[delayed]

Musk is a U.S. citizen.

Also seems relatively clear that he started his first company in the US while on a visa that did not allow that, thus breaking immigration law as well.

He has killed over 5.99 million Jews?

Is that your requirement for someone to be a NAZI ?

At least a better requirement than 'Not helped to bomb some russian military ships'

Both sides have become ridiculous and unreasonable. Neither have any of the morals they are talking about.