Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Erratum:

> Transactions may observe none, part, or all

Should, I think, read:

> Consumets may observe none, part, or all






Both are true, but we use "transactions" for clarity, since the semantics of consumers outside transactions is even murkier. Every read in this workload takes place in the context of a transaction, and goes through the transactional offset commit path.

Ah, got it; I was assuming that “transactions” was referring to the transactions mentioned as the subject of the previous sentence, not the transactions active in consumers observing those. My mistake!



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: