I’d be more cynical still and ask, where is correct information found in the first place? Humans of all shape and size have biases. Most research is faulty, fabricated, or not reproducible. Missing information tells a greater story than existing one.
We don’t have a way of finding objective information, why would we be able to train a model to do so?
Right now I basically can't find anything, the bar isn't "objective information" but "somewhat useful information". Google search quality became so bad we're past the debate of objective or subjective already, I'd be happy enough to get non-spam results.
We don’t have a way of finding objective information, why would we be able to train a model to do so?