you're going in the wrong direction with this line of questioning. language is couched in culture. the single source of truth can be accepted or ignored, either way... sincerity of purpose and wisdom are paired.
If that were true, then it wouldn’t be possible to translate between all languages.
There are conditions of possibility of language use that are universal, even if they do not appear in any given language. But one also expresses themselves other than in words, like in artworks, and this expression often has the same force as language: in fact, the expression itself precludes language and if words are used it is only as a means. Affective history, upon which words move, is that condition of possibility for expression.
