Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

For security purposes, wouldn't it be enough for the mechanism to simply display a change in the signing status, and not restrict boot? This would allow for the detection of malware without restricting how people use their hardware.

Displaying or dismissing such a notification needs to be built into the hardware in such a way that the OS wouldn't be able to interfere. There should also be a read-only channel for applications running on the OS to access the signing status to enable security programs.




It's pretty well agreed that notifying the user and allowing them to dismiss the notification is a useless security model.


Which is why you also have the ability for security programs to access the same information.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: