Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It’s been safer than a human driver for years. It’s also not meant to be unsupervised.


Something about these two statements seem to be in conflict with each other, but maybe that is just kinda Tesla PR talk.


It is cultish doublespeak.


It’s quite easy to be safer than a human driver, since humans are just human. Supervision is required because the system can face edge cases.


Edge cases like intersections?


Ah ok so if humans would be supervised for their edge cases then humans would actually be safer!


"safer than a human driver for years" can be misleading, since the system is supervised - it assists the human driver. So what we're comparing is human+FSD vs avg car (with whatever driver assist it has).

The claim that FSD+human is safer than an average car is old and has since been debunked: if instead of comparing vs all cars (old and new, with and without driver assistance) you compare like for like: other cars of similar price also with cruise control and lanekeeping assistance, then the Tesla cars are as safe as the others.

And to be clear, none of those are autonomous. There is a certification process for autonomous cars, followed by Waymo Mercedes and others. Tesla has not even started this process.


Safer than a human driver...

According to Tesla.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: