Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I find Nick arguing pretty much to the point and the quote above was ripped from it’s context which is a huge section balancing the arguments against each other.

tldr He argues there are better ways for scaling out than threads and removing the GIL would have enormous consequence _throughout_ the whole code base so it’s removal cannot be warranted.

Reducing 10 paragraphs and 11 bullet points to “only stupid people use threads” is just poor style.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: