Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It would make more sense to me that "at cost" is relative to Google. Google pays Asus to manufacture these devices. I'm pretty sure that the payments to Asus include Asus' margin. The point being that Google is getting no margin.



the point is that it makes no difference: either way the other manufacturers will not get the subsidization, so they can't match the price point.


If Asus can make it for Google with a margin for themselves, then other manufacturers could do the same. I doubt that Asus is making these devices for Google at no profit.


Oh, come on, really?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: