Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's slightly more nuanced than that, in that starliner didn't actually break down. It had some issues which presented increased risk for the astronauts, but it was still operational. If there was a true emergency on ISS, they would've gone on starliner. But because there was no danger of them staying longer till the next ride, they opted out of using starliner given the increased risk.



> It had some issues which presented increased risk for the astronauts, but it was still operational

We didn’t know that!

> because there was no danger of them staying longer till the next ride

I suppose it’s a step forward that we’ve normalised the baseline dangers (and costs, personal and financial) of being in space.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: