It seems to be a quote from a London court ruling in 2010: https://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c1895
> Instead, this is a case where the trial of ideas plays out in the pages of peer
> reviewed journals, and the scientific public sits as the jury.” (cleaned up)); Underwager v. Salter,
> 22 F.3d 730, 736 (7th Cir. 1994) (affirming summary judgment against defamation claims and
> stating that “[s]cientific controversies must be settled by the methods of science rather than by
> the methods of litigation”).
So, https://casetext.com/case/underwager-v-salter
It seems to be a quote from a London court ruling in 2010: https://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c1895