When you take a “methods” class in graduate school for history, you learn about the different theoretical frameworks historians use. You never really spend any time talking about actual methods of going about and doing research. I always found it interesting to go and pick the brains of different professors about their actual, day-to-day working methods. of course, they tend to share similarities, but there’s always some weird little personal quirks thrown in there that each individual has found, through ongoing trial and error, works for them.
But it’s loveliest for the warm glow of nostalgia and contentment the author wraps the seemingly mundane topic of working methods with. Juxtapose this with the infinity of comparisons between different note-taking apps out there. I’d rather scratch my eyes out rather than see another one of those. This, though, I’ve already printed and added to my own files.
When you take a “methods” class in graduate school for history, you learn about the different theoretical frameworks historians use. You never really spend any time talking about actual methods of going about and doing research. I always found it interesting to go and pick the brains of different professors about their actual, day-to-day working methods. of course, they tend to share similarities, but there’s always some weird little personal quirks thrown in there that each individual has found, through ongoing trial and error, works for them.
But it’s loveliest for the warm glow of nostalgia and contentment the author wraps the seemingly mundane topic of working methods with. Juxtapose this with the infinity of comparisons between different note-taking apps out there. I’d rather scratch my eyes out rather than see another one of those. This, though, I’ve already printed and added to my own files.