Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Though perpetual motion is reasoned to be false, rather than declared false because statistically we never had any luck trying, or by an exhaustive search of all possible perpetual motion machines.



It isn't just statistics and bad luck for PM inventors. There are physical reasons arguing strongly that it's impossible.


That's what I said. How are you reading the opposite?


You're right: you said "statistically we never had any luck trying, or by an exhaustive search of all possible perpetual motion machines." as an antithesis.

I took "reasoned to be false" as sort of a weak and refutable statement.


That is what the person you're responding to meant.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: