Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Creating a separate store just to be able to get away with anti consume anti competitive practices everywhere else is just so dishonest and unethical. I don’t understand why consumers give Apple the benefit of the doubt, trusting such a powerful entity to be benevolent. But I guess maybe it is because the everyday user isn’t visibly affected by those practices and they don’t know that they could benefit from change?



The alternative here is Google/Samsung.

I'm not sure what you expect consumers to do, but my other halfs Pixel phones have been absolutely rubbish with a significant flaw each generation.

My Fitbit has been degrading ever since Google picked them up.

Samsung at least gives me working reliable hardware, but are still stuck with Android and Googles forcing of shitty extras.

Other Android providers exist, but after being burnt several times by providers abandoning updates and my work VPN refusing to run with old versions with security flaws, I dont blame people for just going down the route that mostly works.

We need an alternative to Android, but that would require companies to make web pages again instead of apps.


I don’t give Apple the benefit of the doubt, but Google didn’t encrypt my phone back when I was using it, and living in a city where mugging is frequent, this is criminal.

Also I’ve always been disappointed with every single feature of Android, but that’s on the side of my choice matrix.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: