Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Which are much cheaper.

Are they? According to whom and compared to what --- the ad networks themselves? They control everything about this game.

It's possible for someone with deep pockets to build an ad network that operates in a similar manner and offers pretty much everything Google and Facebook do minus the privacy invasion crap.

The only essential difference being how the ads are targeted. Instead of targeting individuals, the web content they are looking at would become the target --- based on the blatantly obvious "metric" that the individual must have at least some interest in what they're looking at.

This should actually be easier/cheaper to implement and maintain (no personalized metrics) and thus the ads should be less expensive. The main reason this doesn't exist in a more popular form --- Google/Facebook have sold advertisers a big load of their own marketing hype and used this to effectively monopolize the market.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: