That's what I thought. So saying "it's not a kernel mode driver" is technically true, but I don't need to explain why it's a bunch of nonsense to try to damage control their incompetence.
No idea why you’re getting downvoted. A configuration file for code that runs in kernel space is usually effectively kernel code (it certainly was in this case) - obviously there are formal methods to allow kernel code to be configured in a “safe” fashion, but it’s obvious that’s not going on here.
