I can't access the actual article, but this doesn't sound like a very substantial bit of work. On its face, it's the type of thing I'd probably expect a decently bright college kid to solve quite well as a week-long project, nothing more.
Even if it was, we don't typically give out patents for mere solutions to novel math problems. Why should this be any different?
> Even if it was, we don't typically give out patents for mere solutions to novel math problems.
Actually, we do give out patents for solutions to problems that involve math (the soluions involving math). Those patents do not cover using the same math for other problems.
Even if it was, we don't typically give out patents for mere solutions to novel math problems. Why should this be any different?