But in all seriousness, it’s amazing that something like this still happens today. And I can only imagine massive amounts of hubris from the founder‘s side is to blame.
Around launch I wondered if they seriously believed what they promised and if anybody there ever tried it themselves.
I kind of suspect that the techno-optimism that plagues the AI sector has metastasised into a more general toxic optimism. This is not the first AI-ish product which was clearly unsuitable for release, yet released anyway.
Part of my (and everyone's) job is to engage in constructive criticism. Companies that discourage this are to be completely avoided as an employee, customer, or investor.
This makes for a nice comparison.